The morals vs ethics of a corporate restructure is a controversial topic.

Here, we discuss two converse views on a corporate restructure. Just because something may be morally wrong (on one view), doesn’t make it unethical on another.

We briefly touch on why a corporate restructure may be the right choice for a shareholder and some creditors and what ‘burnt’ creditors could do if it is done incorrectly.

At Norling Law, we are on both sides of corporate restructures. Sometimes we are on the side of the creditors who want to hold the debtors’ director liable. Other times, we assist the directors of the debtor company to undertake a robust restructure of the business that allows the business to continue, whilst some creditors remain unpaid.

Whichever side you are on, we can provide insight. We offer a FREE 30-minute legal consult where we can discuss the issues. You can book here:

You may also like

No. 1 Way to Avoid Using A Litigation Lawyer
What is the #1 way to avoid using a Litigation Lawyer like me? If you follow this one tip you will be more likely to avoid disputes and therefore engaging a dispute resolution lawyer!
The Three Things Every Term of Trade Needs
Here are the three things every term of trade NEEDS when it comes to collecting your debts. We see too many people miss out because they do not have these three things incorporated into their terms. Having these three things will [...]
How to avoid Shareholder disputes?
In this video we analyze common problems with shareholding arrangements and some very simple strategies to avoid them which includes many of the discussions to have upfront to agree on the major issues. Who can appoint and remove [...]
1151617

Page 17 of 17