By norlinglaw

The morals vs ethics of a corporate restructure is a controversial topic.

Here, we discuss two converse views on a corporate restructure. Just because something may be morally wrong (on one view), doesn’t make it unethical on another.

We briefly touch on why a corporate restructure may be the right choice for a shareholder and some creditors and what ‘burnt’ creditors could do if it is done incorrectly.

At Norling Law, we are on both sides of corporate restructures. Sometimes we are on the side of the creditors who want to hold the debtors’ director liable. Other times, we assist the directors of the debtor company to undertake a robust restructure of the business that allows the business to continue, whilst some creditors remain unpaid.

Whichever side you are on, we can provide insight. We offer a FREE 30-minute legal consult where we can discuss the issues. You can book here:

You may also like

Liquidator Replacement: Scarbro Construction
There are a number of companies the Scarbro Construction Group, some of which are in liquidation. We act for creditors of Scarbro Construction. On behalf of our clients, we believe that the liquidators ought to be replaced with ...
Who Pays the Insolvency Practitioner?
So an insolvency practitioner has been appointed. So who pays his bills? The creditors? The person who appointed? The shareholders? Or? In this video Brent Norling gives a quick rundown of who is required to pay the practitioner’s ...
How Funds Are Distributed in a Liquidation
If you find yourself in the unfortunate position of being owed money from a company in liquidation, then this video is for you. When a company is liquidated there is a priority regime that must be followed when it comes to ...
Page 1 of 18