By norlinglaw

The morals vs ethics of a corporate restructure is a controversial topic.

Here, we discuss two converse views on a corporate restructure. Just because something may be morally wrong (on one view), doesn’t make it unethical on another.

We briefly touch on why a corporate restructure may be the right choice for a shareholder and some creditors and what ‘burnt’ creditors could do if it is done incorrectly.

At Norling Law, we are on both sides of corporate restructures. Sometimes we are on the side of the creditors who want to hold the debtors’ director liable. Other times, we assist the directors of the debtor company to undertake a robust restructure of the business that allows the business to continue, whilst some creditors remain unpaid.

Whichever side you are on, we can provide insight. We offer a FREE 30-minute legal consult where we can discuss the issues. You can book here:


You may also like

The Reason Shareholders have Disputes
Here at Norling Law we resolve a high volume of commercial disputes, including shareholder disputes. Across these disputes we see a very common theme which is the root cause of these disputes. The good news is that you can take ...
The Reason Your Contract is Unenforceable
Here at Norling Law we see a common situation occurring where people have great robust contracts that they have probably spent a bunch of money on to create but those contracts are not enforceable. They can’t be relied upon. Here I ...
Best Way to set a Solid Foundation to Resolve a Commercial Dispute
Here we outline The Best Way to Set a Solid Foundation to Resolve a Commercial Dispute. Because let’s be fair, sometimes you need to ensure your foundation is SOLID before you build up from that. #Winning #Negotiation #NorlingLaw
Page 16 of 18