By norlinglaw

Damien Grant of Waterstone Insolvency and Brent Norling of Norling Law sat down to discuss a very controversial area of insolvency law, voidable transactions. It seems very unjust when a liquidator requires you to repay money you have worked very hard to generate. Liquidators can claw back money that was paid up to two years prior to a liquidation. At Norling Law, we often see liquidators overreaching and overstating their position. Without expert advice, recipients of funds can be pressured to pay back money that they are really entitled to retain. We put a spotlight on the area and discuss it with a liquidator to gain another perspective. Full video here:


You may also like

Clerking at Norling Law
The difference between studying law and law in practice can be quite a contrast. Especially with what is taught in lectures in comparison to some of the real-life cases we deal with on a day to day basis. There can be a steep ...
Morality vs Ethics in a Corporate Restructure
The morals vs ethics of a corporate restructure is a controversial topic. Here, we discuss two converse views on a corporate restructure. Just because something may be morally wrong (on one view), doesn’t make it unethical on ...
How to Get Paid from a Debtor Company
It can be very frustrating when you provide goods or services and the debtor company doesn’t pay. Perhaps they can’t pay. Perhaps they won’t pay. But you have provided the goods and services and the debt is due and there is no ...
Page 10 of 18