By norlinglaw

The morals vs ethics of a corporate restructure is a controversial topic.

Here, we discuss two converse views on a corporate restructure. Just because something may be morally wrong (on one view), doesn’t make it unethical on another.

We briefly touch on why a corporate restructure may be the right choice for a shareholder and some creditors and what ‘burnt’ creditors could do if it is done incorrectly.

At Norling Law, we are on both sides of corporate restructures. Sometimes we are on the side of the creditors who want to hold the debtors’ director liable. Other times, we assist the directors of the debtor company to undertake a robust restructure of the business that allows the business to continue, whilst some creditors remain unpaid.

Whichever side you are on, we can provide insight. We offer a FREE 30-minute legal consult where we can discuss the issues. You can book here:


You may also like

Shareholder Appointed Liquidators
In this video Brent Norling of Norling Law and Damien Grant of Waterstone Insolvency discuss the issues that can arise from a shareholder appointed liquidator. There is the common perception that a shareholder appointed liquidator ...
How to Protect Your Business in Times of Crisis
Today Brent Norling from Norling Law and Damien Grant from Waterstone Insolvency join Glenn Marvin from Konnector on his daily web-series. In this video, we discuss prevention techniques to avoid getting into trouble in the wake of ...
Outstanding Debts During Covid 19
In this video Brent Norling and Jamie McKenzie discuss how to deal with recovering outstanding debts in the era of Covid-19. During these times, money is a concern. It is crucial to get paid during these times, but we need to be ...
Page 7 of 18