By norlinglaw

So an insolvency practitioner has been appointed. So who pays his bills? The creditors? The person who appointed? The shareholders? Or?

In this video Brent Norling gives a quick rundown of who is required to pay the practitioner’s fees in order to get the result that is sought.

The first thing to understand is the difference between different kinds of appointment. For example, a receivership vs a liquidation. Different appointments will attract different obligations.

As you can expect, the person who pays, has the say. So its important to understand who is paying the insolvency practitioner so you can have an insight as to who will be at the decision making table.

If you need assistance with an insolvency matter, we offer a FREE 30-minute legal consultation. You can book here:


You may also like

An Alternative Way to Resolve a Shareholder Dispute
Shareholder disputes can be toxic. It can result in: Creditors not being paid; Staff not being paid; Directors taking remuneration they are not entitled to; Transactions occurring without consent; Loss of key suppliers or ...
Voidable Transactions: Lawyer and a Liquidator Perspective (Intro Video)
Damien Grant of Waterstone Insolvency and Brent Norling of Norling Law sat down to discuss a very controversial area of insolvency law, voidable transactions. It seems very unjust when a liquidator requires you to repay money you ...
Voidable Transactions: Lawyer and a Liquidator Perspective
Damien Grant of Waterstone Insolvency and Brent Norling of Norling Law sat down to discuss a very controversial area of insolvency law, voidable transactions. It seems very unjust when a liquidator requires you to repay money you ...
Page 13 of 18