By norlinglaw

Mainzeal was a large construction company in New Zealand. It was a large domino that caused many small dominos to fall in slow succession.

Mainzeal was traded recklessly by its directors. Ultimately, the creditors were owed $110m and are unlikely to receive any distribution of any significance.

The liquidators pursed the directors at the High Court and were successful.

In part.

Ultimately, the recovery is too low to have any real impact on the creditors who have suffered a loss.

Here, Damien Grant of Waterstone Insolvency and Brent Norling of Norling Law discuss the facts, the legal case and the outcome for creditors.


You may also like

Voidable Transactions: Lawyer and a Liquidator Perspective
Damien Grant of Waterstone Insolvency and Brent Norling of Norling Law sat down to discuss a very controversial area of insolvency law, voidable transactions. It seems very unjust when a liquidator requires you to repay money you ...
The Most Important Document In Litigation
We often see people taking a pro forma approach to drafting the most important document in litigation. The document that is the roadmap for the entire proceeding. The document that dictates what other steps are necessary in the ...
Mainzeal: The Rise and Fall (Intro Video)
Mainzeal was a large construction company in New Zealand. It was a large domino that caused many small dominos to fall in slow succession. Mainzeal was traded recklessly by its directors. Ultimately, the creditors were owed $110m ...
Page 14 of 18