Unfortunately, companies fail. When this happens, what are the obligations of the individuals who possess knowledge or information about the company?
Liquidators have wide powers to require certain persons to hand over documents and attend interviews under oath. However, these powers are not unfettered. There are boundaries to the powers. There are also obligations on certain persons (like directors and employees) to take certain steps immediately after a liquidation, without prior notice being given to them.
It is important to understand:
Liquidation is challenging and often distressing time for companies and their stakeholders. When a company goes into liquidation, it is important to understand that relationships with external parties, such as lawyers and accountants, still exist. In this blog post, we will explore the obligations and powers that come into play during company liquidation.
One aspect to consider is the privilege claimed by lawyers. They sometimes argue that certain information is privileged because their relationship is primarily with the company director, rather than the company itself. This can create complications when seeking information during the liquidation process. It highlights the importance of clarifying the nature of the relationship between lawyers and both the company and its directors.
Section 261 of the Companies Act 1993 grants liquidators extensive powers to obtain information from anyone with knowledge of the company’s affairs. This provision equips liquidators with the authority to collect crucial evidence and gain insights into the company’s operations.
1. Document Requests:
2. Interviews Under Oath:
During interviews with liquidators, information gathering is generally limited to the affairs of the company. It is important to understand this limitation to ensure that the scope of the discussion remains focused and relevant.
1. Limited Use of Interview Answers:
2. Questions about Related Entities and Transfers:
As long as the question fits within the scope of what can legitimately be asked, refusing to answer a question is generally not allowed unless the person genuinely does not know the answer or needs to consult relevant documents.
Section 266 serves as the enforcement mechanism for s 261. It provides liquidators with the necessary means to obtain documents that relate to the company, even if those documents are not considered to be directly owned by the company. This provision strengthens the powers granted to liquidators and ensures the wider availability of information for their investigations.
Section 274 imposes an obligation on directors and employees of a company to provide information about the company’s assets after the company has entered liquidation. This obligation is triggered immediately upon the commencement of the liquidation process.
1. Asset Information:
2. Delivery of Assets:
The consequences of failing to comply with s 274 can be severe. Directors and employees who do not fulfil their obligations may face imprisonment for up to two years or substantial fines. While these consequences exist, it is important to acknowledge that the current enforcement of these obligations is often limited and the actual penalties imposed tend to be minimal.
Navigating the complexities of company liquidation requires a comprehensive understanding of the obligations and powers involved. While s 261 grants liquidators extensive powers, there are limitations and safeguards in place to protect the rights of individuals being interviewed. Additionally, the enforcement mechanism provided by s 266 strengthens the ability of liquidators to obtain necessary information. Directors and employees, on the other hand, have a legal obligation under s 274 to disclose asset information promptly.
It is crucial for all parties involved in company liquidation, including directors, employees, lawyers, and accountants, to be aware of their rights, limitations, and responsibilities. Seeking professional advice and guidance during this process is recommended to ensure compliance with the relevant legislation and avoiding potential legal ramifications.
If you want assistance in this area, we offer a FREE 30-minute legal consultation where we can discuss the issues and the strategy to move forward.
Brent is the Director of Norling Law. He has a wealth of experience in the District Court, High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. Brent is passionate about negotiating favourable outcomes for his clients and able to implement this in his daily negotiations.
Book a free consultation to get clarity on your options and next steps
We’ve been guiding people through times of uncertainty since 2015. Talk to us for free to see what we can do for you.