In the world of business, shareholder disputes are akin to family squabbles that have gone public – they’re complicated, fraught with emotion, and can have lasting impacts on the company’s future.
Shareholder disputes can be toxic and it can result in:
Negotiations can be hampered by a breakdown in trust and firm views on pricing, with majority shareholders sometimes forcing minority shareholders into selling at disadvantageous prices. This reveals a critical aspect of shareholder disputes: they’re not just legal battles; they’re emotional and psychological dramas that require careful, strategic handling.
In the face of these challenges, Section 174 of the Companies Act emerges as a potent tool for oppressed or prejudiced shareholders. This provision offers a pathway to court intervention, allowing various remedies, including liquidation, receivership, or mandatory buyouts, to resolve disputes fairly and equitably.
The concept of prejudice in these disputes is broadly defined, encompassing actions like blocking resolutions, entering into contracts unilaterally, and unequal financial distributions. This broad definition ensures that the courts can address a wide range of unfair practices.
The importance of being fully informed about all available options and rights is essential. Understanding the mechanisms for dispute resolution can prevent poor strategic decisions and ensure that outcomes are fair for all parties involved. Section 174 of the Companies Act, in particular, offers a valuable avenue for seeking justice and resolution in these often contentious situations.
If you are having shareholder disputes, staying informed and considering all options before making decisions is paramount. Only through informed, strategic action can shareholders hope to resolve disputes in a manner that is both equitable and beneficial for all parties involved.
Our shareholder dispute lawyers offer a free legal consultation where we can discuss the issues and formulate the best strategy to resolve them.
You can book a free consultation or download our E-book: The Five Options to Resolve Shareholder Disputes
Brent is the Director of Norling Law. He has a wealth of experience in the District Court, High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. Brent is passionate about negotiating favourable outcomes for his clients and able to implement this in his daily negotiations.
Book a free consultation to get clarity on your options and next steps
We’ve been guiding people through times of uncertainty since 2015. Talk to us for free to see what we can do for you.