01

Blog

Norling-triangle-Orange

An Alternative Way to Resolve a Shareholder Dispute

Navigating the Stormy Waters of Shareholder Disputes

In the world of business, shareholder disputes are akin to family squabbles that have gone public – they’re complicated, fraught with emotion, and can have lasting impacts on the company’s future.

Shareholder disputes can be toxic and it can result in:

  • Creditors not being paid;
  • Staff not being paid;
  • Directors taking remuneration they are not entitled to;
  • Transactions occurring without consent;
  • Loss of key suppliers or customers;  Unilateral decisions being made;
  • Assets being stripped; and/or
  • The true financial details of the Company being hidden.

Understanding Shareholder Disputes

Common Issues Leading to Disputes:

  • Financial disagreements often trigger disputes, especially concerning fair compensation.
  • Disputes may result in a deadlock, with one party dominating business decisions, which can last anywhere from 12 to 24 months.

Traditional Resolution Methods:

  • Shareholders’ agreements may provide for buyouts, mediation, or arbitration.
  • In the absence of an agreement, direct negotiations are common, though often complicated by mistrust and emotional baggage.

The Challenges of Negotiation

Negotiations can be hampered by a breakdown in trust and firm views on pricing, with majority shareholders sometimes forcing minority shareholders into selling at disadvantageous prices. This reveals a critical aspect of shareholder disputes: they’re not just legal battles; they’re emotional and psychological dramas that require careful, strategic handling.

A Ray of Hope: Section 174 of the Companies Act

In the face of these challenges, Section 174 of the Companies Act emerges as a potent tool for oppressed or prejudiced shareholders. This provision offers a pathway to court intervention, allowing various remedies, including liquidation, receivership, or mandatory buyouts, to resolve disputes fairly and equitably.

Prejudice in Shareholder Disputes

The concept of prejudice in these disputes is broadly defined, encompassing actions like blocking resolutions, entering into contracts unilaterally, and unequal financial distributions. This broad definition ensures that the courts can address a wide range of unfair practices.

Practical Advice for Shareholders

The importance of being fully informed about all available options and rights is essential. Understanding the mechanisms for dispute resolution can prevent poor strategic decisions and ensure that outcomes are fair for all parties involved.  Section 174 of the Companies Act, in particular, offers a valuable avenue for seeking justice and resolution in these often contentious situations.

If you are having shareholder disputes, staying informed and considering all options before making decisions is paramount. Only through informed, strategic action can shareholders hope to resolve disputes in a manner that is both equitable and beneficial for all parties involved.

Our shareholder dispute lawyers offer a free legal consultation where we can discuss the issues and formulate the best strategy to resolve them.

You can book a free consultation or download our E-book: The Five Options to Resolve Shareholder Disputes

02

Author Profile

Norling-triangle-Orange

Book a free consultation to get clarity on your options and next steps

Google Rating
4.8
Based on 84 reviews
×
js_loader

Book Your Free Consultation

Book your Free Consultation
with Norling Law

We’ve been guiding people through times of uncertainty since 2015. Talk to us for free to see what we can do for you.